This post may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission from purchased products at no additional cost to you. See my full disclosure here.
Somewhere along the way, a lot of us picked up a quiet ranking system for church leadership. Full-time paid pastors at the top. Bi-vocational somewhere in the middle, respected but maybe not quite as committed. Volunteer pastors at the bottom, the temporary solution until the church can afford a real pastor.
This hierarchy in church leadership is something we absorbed without even realizing it. And we did not get it from scripture. We got it from culture and tradition and the way things have always been done.
And it is hurting our churches.
What if the models themselves are not the problem? What if the issue is the hierarchy we have attached to them? The unspoken ladder we keep trying to climb? The pride or the shame or the comparison that creeps in when we think one way is better than another?
Let’s rethink this together.
There Is Not A Single Biblical Or Correct Model
Let’s put this right up front. There is not a single biblical or correct or more spiritual leadership model for any church.
Some of us grew up believing that a real church has a full-time pastor paid. Others grew up believing that a bi-vocational pastor is more humble and more noble because Paul made tents. Others grew up believing that if a pastor is not paid, the church must be struggling. Or the flip side, that a volunteer pastor has a special calling because they do not need to be paid.
None of that is scripture. This is culture. This is tradition. This is maybe what we have always known or something we were taught. The hierarchy in church leadership that we have accepted is not rooted in the Bible at all.
When we look at scripture honestly, we see multiple expressions of leadership all at the same time. Paul worked and preached, a bi-vocational model. Some leaders were financially supported, and others were not. We see ministry teams where groups of people share responsibility like elders, teachers, and prophets. That was plural, not singular.
There was not one perfect model that was exemplified in scripture, like this is the way it should always be done. And there is not one perfect model today. Churches across history and all around the world have thrived under every different model.
So where did the ladder come from? We inherited it.
When We Inherit A Model, We Inherit Its Assumptions
Here is one of the harder parts of this conversation. When we inherit a model, we usually inherit the assumptions that are attached to it.
If your church has always had a paid pastor, you probably inherited the assumption that changing that model means you are failing. If your church has always been volunteer-led, you might have inherited the assumption that you need to prove you are legitimate even though you do not pay your pastor.
The assumptions in our heads might sound like this. If we change the model, are we failing? What would happen if we changed? We might be sending the wrong message. People might think we are dying. What will the pastor think? Will they think they are not valued? Will this disrupt the congregation?
This is where pride and fear and comparison sneak in. Sometimes quietly. Sometimes not that quiet at all. A church that has always had a full-time pastor can suddenly feel very wrong or even ashamed if they shift to having a bi-vocational pastor. A church that has never paid a pastor can feel defensive, like they have to prove they are legitimate.
But these feelings are not rooted in scripture. They are rooted in a cultural hierarchy in church leadership that we absorbed without realizing it.
These Are Just Different Ways Of Doing Things
This is the part we need to sit with. Paid, bi-vocational, and volunteer pastoral models are not ranks. They are not awards. They are not measures of faithfulness or success.
They are just different ways of doing things.
I know fully volunteer churches that are not tiny. Some of them are upwards of a hundred or two hundred and even higher, worshiping on a Sunday. I also know churches of under fifty who pay a full-time pastor. So please do not equate these models with size or with success. The model is not a signal or a sign of financial health or numerical growth or spiritual maturity.
None of these models is more noble than the others. They are just different ways of stewarding what is real.
Hierarchy In Church Leadership Creates Damage
Any model can work. It is not the model that creates the success or the pressure. It is not understanding. It is not sharing expectations. It is not setting up these models well.
When we attach a hierarchy, we create problems that do not need to exist. The paid pastor feels pressure to earn their salary like a performance review. The bi-vocational pastor feels judged as less committed when capacity is not about care. The volunteer pastor feels invisible, hearing people say one day we will be able to hire a real pastor.
None of that is necessary. All three of these models are valid. All three can be super healthy. But only when we stop ranking them.
Let’s Throw Out The Ladder
Sometimes we do that little stair-stepping thing in our minds. We treat one model as the goal and the others as stepping stones to get there. Or we treat one model as the ideal and feel like we have fallen if we cannot sustain it anymore.
I would like to just throw that thought completely out of the room.
All of these models can be beautiful and healthy and effective and highly impacting. But the shame or the pride or the comparison, those things get in the way. That thought I mentioned earlier, where what we are used to feels like what is right and we do not want to make a change, that is just tradition talking, not truth.
So let’s separate what is actually true from what we inherited. Let’s stop attaching a hierarchy or judgment to different leadership models because they can all be healthy and effective.
They are tools. They are not a ladder. And nobody needs to climb.
A Question Worth Asking Together
If the unspoken hierarchy in church leadership has been weighing on your church, here is a simple place to begin. Gather a few trusted people and ask one question.
What assumptions have we inherited about what makes a leadership model legitimate, and are we willing to look at those honestly?
You do not need to change anything today. You just need to name it. Because when we name the hierarchy, it starts to lose its grip. And when it loses its grip, we can see clearly what is actually best for the church body we have right now.
Honesty creates space for truth. And truth creates space for hope.
Want to keep thinking through what healthy leadership structures look like for your church? Join the conversation in the Small Church Ministry Facebook group where we talk about the real stuff without judgment.
Read More:
4 Things Young Families Need From Your Small Church
